AI for Turkish law
From research to filing, in one workspace.
Search, research, drafting and matter management together. Behind every answer is a real decision you can open and read.
The problem
The work splits apart, and the hours stay there.
Research in one place, the draft in another, the matter somewhere else again. Every hand-off costs time you cannot bill.
Search matches words, not concepts.
Official portals need the exact word. Rulings that make the same point in different terms never reach your list.
The ruling you found never reaches the text you write.
Copy and paste is what closes the gap between research and filing, and the authority gets lost on the way in.
General-purpose AI cannot cite.
Chatbots produce text that sounds right and cannot be verified. You cannot rest an argument on it.
Platform
A whole matter, in one place.
Five surfaces working on the same corpus under the same citation discipline. What you find in one is at hand in the next.
- AramaFast search across case law
- Describe the point you need in your own words, or enter the exact article and decision number. Narrow by institution and date.
- AsistanAsk, upload, get an answer
- Ask your legal question or upload the matter. A reasoned answer comes back with every decision it rests on one click away.
- BelgeDrafting filings and opinions
- Write the draft together, see changes tracked, move between versions, and export to editable Word.
- DosyalarClient and case matters
- File searches, threads and documents where they belong. Returning to a matter means picking up where you left off.
- Kurum BeyniYour firm’s own rules
- Set your firm’s drafting preferences and working rules once. Every new text arrives already following them.
Approach
Every answer rests on a decision.
Nearly every tool on the market says it uses AI. What matters is what happens between the question and the answer.
Nothing is cited unread
Before a decision is cited, the decision itself is read in full. No reasoning is built on a summary of a summary.
Citations are verified before you see them
Every quotation that enters the text is checked against the source decision. A sentence that is not in the source never reaches you.
It works in the language of Turkish law
Not a foreign tool translated into Turkish. Built around the terminology of Turkish law and the structure of its case law.
Security
Client data, handled as professional confidentiality requires.
A law firm asks this before it asks about features. We have no badges to show. We have architecture.
- Infrastructure inside the European Union
- Data is held on infrastructure located in the EU. Model inference is run in an EU region too.
- Your content does not train models
- Third-party models are not trained on your data. That is a contractual commitment, not a commercial preference.
- The matter boundary is the default
- Access to a matter is scoped to that matter. One client’s documents do not surface while a lawyer works on another.
- Deletion reaches everything
- Delete a document and the original, its extracted text and its index entries go with it. The process stops rather than half-deleting.
We hold no security certification and we do not pretend otherwise. Everything above is true today.
Questions
Frequently asked.
Is this legal advice?
No. Frontier Legal is a research and drafting tool and does not practise law. Verifying outputs against the source, and professional responsibility, remain with the user.
Where is my data held?
Our infrastructure is in the European Union and model inference runs in an EU region. Turkish law does not require legal data to be held in Türkiye.
Is my client data used to train models?
No. Your content is not used to train third-party models, and that is committed contractually. Content passes through anonymisation before it leaves the boundary for inference.
Can citations really be verified?
Yes. Every citation is built by reading the decision in full, and is checked against its source before you see it. The link beside each citation opens the decision it rests on.
Which sources are covered?
Decisions from the Court of Cassation, Council of State, Emsal (UYAP), Constitutional Court, Court of Jurisdictional Disputes, Court of Accounts, Competition Authority, SPK, BDDK, BTK, KVKK and the Revenue Administration, plus legislation.
How often is the corpus updated?
Sources are crawled on a regular rotation and new decisions are added to the corpus. Currency is shown per source inside the application.
What does it cost?
The product is currently in beta.
How is this different from a general chatbot?
The difference is how the answer is built: the decision is read in full, the citation is checked against its source, its validity is tested, and the result stays traceable to where it came from.
See how it works in your firm.
Let us set up a short demo. We can walk through an example from your own matters.
Request a demo